
How Load Balancers Distribute Traffic

Imagine launching a new feature and suddenly your app gets flooded with users-maybe a YouTube shoutout, a Product Hunt launch, or a festive sale rush.
If all those requests hit a single server, things fall apart fast:
- Slow responses
- Crashed servers
- Angry users refreshing the page
This is where load balancers quietly save the day.
In this post, we’ll break down:
- What a load balancer actually does
- How it distributes traffic
- The most common algorithms it uses
- What happens when servers fail
- Why every scalable system depends on it
No buzzwords. No fluff. Just how it really works.
What Is a Load Balancer?
A load balancer sits between users and your backend servers.
Instead of users directly talking to your app servers, they talk to the load balancer. The load balancer then decides:
“Which server should handle this request?”
Think of it like a traffic police officer at a busy junction-directing vehicles so no single road gets jammed.
Simple flow:
1User → Load Balancer → Backend Server
From the outside, users see one application.
Behind the scenes, traffic is being carefully distributed.
Why Load Balancers Exist
Without a load balancer:
- One server becomes a single point of failure
- Scaling means manual DNS changes
- Downtime is almost guaranteed
With a load balancer:
- Traffic is evenly spread
- Servers can be added or removed safely
- Failures are handled automatically
This is why load balancers are foundational infrastructure, not an “advanced optimization”.
How Traffic Reaches the Load Balancer
Here’s what actually happens when a user opens your app:
- The user enters your domain (e.g.,
app.example.com) - DNS points the domain to the load balancer’s IP
- Every request now hits the load balancer first
- The load balancer forwards the request to a backend server
- The response flows back through the load balancer to the user
From the user’s perspective-nothing looks different.
Behind the scenes-everything is controlled.
Common Traffic Distribution Strategies
1. Round Robin
Requests are sent sequentially:
1Server A → Server B → Server C → repeat
Pros
- Simple and predictable
- Works well when servers are identical
Cons
- Ignores real-time server load
Best for: small systems with evenly sized servers
2. Least Connections
The load balancer asks:
“Which server is handling the fewest active requests?”
Pros
- Adapts to uneven traffic
- Prevents overloaded servers
Best for: APIs and long-running requests
3. Weighted Distribution
Not all servers are equal.
Example:
- Server A (weight 3)
- Server B (weight 1)
Server A receives 3× more traffic.
Pros
- Ideal for mixed instance sizes
- Useful during gradual scaling
4. IP Hashing (Sticky Sessions)
Requests from the same user IP always go to the same server.
Pros
- Maintains session consistency
Cons
- Can create uneven load
Best for: legacy apps relying on in-memory sessions
Health Checks: The Secret Sauce
Load balancers don’t blindly forward traffic.
They constantly ask each server:
“Are you alive?”
This is done using health checks:
- Ping a specific endpoint (e.g.,
/health) - Expect a valid response
- Mark the server unhealthy if it fails
If a server goes down:
- Traffic is rerouted automatically
- Users never notice
- No manual intervention needed
This is how high-availability systems survive real-world failures.
What Happens When a Server Crashes?
Let’s say Server B suddenly dies:
- Health check fails
- Load balancer removes Server B from rotation
- Traffic continues to Server A and C
- When Server B recovers → it’s added back automatically
This is fault tolerance-one of the biggest advantages of load balancing.
Layer 4 vs Layer 7 Load Balancing
Layer 4 (Transport Layer)
- Operates on IP and port
- Extremely fast
- No awareness of request content
Example: TCP traffic routing
Layer 7 (Application Layer)
- Understands HTTP, headers, paths
- Can route based on:
- URLs
- Cookies
- Headers
Example:
1/api → API servers2/admin → Admin servers
Most modern web applications rely on Layer 7 load balancing.
Load Balancers and Scaling
Load balancers enable:
- Horizontal scaling (adding more servers)
- Zero-downtime deployments
- Rolling updates
You can:
- Add servers during peak traffic (sales, festivals, launches)
- Remove servers during low usage
- Deploy new versions gradually
All without users noticing anything.
A Real-World Setup
A typical production architecture looks like this:
1Users2 ↓3Load Balancer4 ↓5Multiple App Servers6 ↓7Database
When traffic grows:
- Add more app servers
- Load balancer distributes requests
- App keeps running smoothly
This is how products scale from 10 users to 10 million.
Why Developers Should Care
Even if you’re not a DevOps engineer:
- Load balancers affect performance
- They influence session handling
- They impact error rates
- They decide uptime
Understanding them helps you:
- Debug production issues faster
- Design scalable systems
- Make better architectural decisions
Final Thoughts
Load balancers are invisible when they work-and disastrous when missing.
They don’t:
- Magically make your app fast
- Fix inefficient code
But they protect your system from collapsing under pressure.
If your app has more than one server or plans to a load balancer isn’t optional. It’s essential.
